Terraform Atlantis vs GitHub Actions: Complete IaC Automation Comparison 2025

Core Architecture and Setup

Design Philosophy Differences

Terraform Atlantis was built with a singular purpose: streamlining collaborative Terraform workflows through pull requests. This specialized focus delivers an elegant, purpose-built solution with minimal configuration while maintaining clear audit trails. GitHub Actions functions as a general-purpose CI/CD platform configured for Terraform operations, offering extensive flexibility and integration options beyond infrastructure deployment.

Implementation Complexity

Atlantis setup requires hosting a service but delivers immediate Terraform workflow benefits:

• Deploy on your infrastructure (Docker, Kubernetes, cloud VMs)
• Configure VCS webhooks and access credentials
• Add provider credentials for Terraform operations

GitHub Actions setup eliminates hosting but needs more workflow configuration:

• Create workflow YAML files in .github/workflows/
• Configure secrets and authentication
• Build custom PR comment systems for plan visibility
• Implement proper state locking mechanisms

Key tradeoff: Atlantis offers complete out-of-the-box Terraform experience with operational overhead, while GitHub Actions eliminates hosting concerns but demands more configuration work.

Cost and Maintenance

Atlantis costs:

• No licensing fees (open-source)
• Infrastructure hosting costs
• Staff time for operational maintenance (updates, monitoring, credential rotation)

GitHub Actions costs:

• GitHub plan costs (includes minutes)
• Additional compute minutes beyond allocation
• Storage costs for artifacts/cache
• Ongoing workflow configuration maintenance

For small-medium teams, GitHub Actions is often more cost-effective. For larger teams with significant Terraform usage, self-hosted Atlantis may provide better cost control.

Workflow Management and Customization

Automation Models

Atlantis implements command-driven workflows centered on pull requests:

• Automatically detects PRs and runs terraform plan
• Posts plan output as PR comments
• Waits for atlantis apply comment from approved reviewers
• Associates locks with specific pull requests

GitHub Actions follows event-driven models triggered by various GitHub events:

on:
  pull_request:
    branches: [ main ]
  push:
    branches: [ main ]
  workflow_dispatch:

GitHub Actions allows different workflows for different events but requires explicit configuration for each scenario. It provides visual workflow tracking that Atlantis lacks, while Atlantis offers more cohesive PR-centric experiences.

Customization Approaches

Atlantis provides focused customization through server-side configuration (repos.yaml) and repository-specific settings (atlantis.yaml):

# atlantis.yaml example
version: 3
projects:
- name: production
  dir: environments/production
  workflow: custom
  apply_requirements: ["approved"]
workflows:
  custom:
    plan:
      steps:
      - run: security-scan
      - init
      - plan
    apply:
      steps:
      - apply

GitHub Actions offers broader customization through marketplace actions, custom containers, and complex workflow orchestration. Teams seeking highly customized workflows extending beyond Terraform will find GitHub Actions more adaptable, while those preferring standardized approaches may favor Atlantis.

Security and State Management

Security Models

Atlantis keeps credentials on your controlled environment:

• Provider credentials remain on your server
• Webhook secrets ensure request legitimacy
• Repository allowlists restrict processing
• Apply requirements enforce proper approvals

GitHub Actions uses GitHub's native security capabilities:

• GitHub Secrets management
• OIDC for temporary cloud provider credentials
• Environment protection rules
• Branch protection and required reviews

Critical difference: With Atlantis, infrastructure credentials never leave your environment, while GitHub Actions processes them within GitHub's infrastructure. For organizations with strict security requirements around credential isolation, this may be decisive.

State Locking

Atlantis provides built-in Terraform-specific locking:

• Project and workspace-level locks tied to pull requests
• Automatic lock creation during operations
• PR-based lock tracking and visibility
• Manual unlocking for administrators

GitHub Actions requires explicit locking configuration:

• Backend-based locking (DynamoDB, Azure Blob, etc.)
• GitHub Actions concurrency settings
• Custom implementations for queuing
• Specialized actions for lock management

Atlantis simplifies concurrency management with minimal configuration, while GitHub Actions offers flexibility but requires careful implementation.

User Experience and Scalability

User Interaction Models

Atlantis centers entirely on pull requests:

• Commands as PR comments (atlantis plan, atlantis apply)
• Plan/apply outputs in PR threads
• Lock status through Atlantis UI
• Minimal context switching

GitHub Actions provides visual but dispersed experience:

• Workflow runs in GitHub Actions UI
• Plan outputs in PR comments (custom implementation needed)
• Status checks on PRs
• Manual approvals through environments

Teams prioritizing tight PR integration prefer Atlantis, while those valuing comprehensive CI/CD visibility may prefer GitHub Actions.

Scalability Considerations

Atlantis scalability:

• Single-instance architecture by default
• Handles hundreds of repositories but can become bottleneck
• Parallel plan/apply capabilities available

GitHub Actions scalability:

• Managed runner infrastructure with automatic scaling
• Self-hosted runners for performance-intensive operations
• Matrix strategies for parallel execution
• Integration with GitHub Enterprise features

For large organizations, GitHub Actions typically offers better scaling through integration with GitHub Enterprise and flexible execution models.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose Atlantis when:

1. Teams primarily focused on Terraform seeking purpose-built solutions
2. Organizations with strict security requirements needing credential isolation
3. Teams using multiple VCS platforms requiring consistent workflows
4. Teams heavily invested in pull request workflows
5. Organizations with dedicated operations teams able to manage additional services

Choose GitHub Actions when:

1. GitHub-centric organizations already invested in the ecosystem
2. Teams managing both application and infrastructure CI/CD wanting unified pipelines
3. Organizations preferring managed services over maintaining infrastructure
4. Teams requiring complex custom workflows beyond standard Terraform operations
5. Projects leveraging GitHub Advanced Security features

Complementary Approaches

Emerging patterns in 2024-2025 include:

1. GitHub Actions for CI, Atlantis for Terraform: Using Actions for linting/security while Atlantis handles plan/apply
2. Hybrid solutions like Digger and Terrateam providing Atlantis-style workflows using GitHub Actions execution
3. Environment-based separation: GitHub Actions for development, Atlantis for production

This hybrid approach addresses operational overhead while maintaining streamlined workflow benefits.

Implementation Examples

Atlantis Configuration (atlantis.yaml)

version: 3
automerge: true
parallel_plan: true
parallel_apply: true
projects:
- name: infrastructure
  dir: terraform
  workspace: default
  terraform_version: 1.6.0
  autoplan:
    when_modified: ["**/*.tf", "**/*.tfvars"]
    enabled: true
  apply_requirements: ["approved"]

workflows:
  default:
    plan:
      steps:
      - run: |
          echo "Running security scan..."
          tfsec .
      - init:
          extra_args: ["-upgrade=false"]
      - plan:
          extra_args: ["-var-file=env.tfvars"]
    apply:
      steps:
      - apply

GitHub Actions Configuration (workflow.yml)

name: 'Terraform'

on:
  pull_request:
    branches: [ main ]
  push:
    branches: [ main ]

permissions:
  id-token: write
  contents: read
  pull-requests: write

jobs:
  terraform:
    name: 'Terraform'
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    environment: ${{ github.event_name == 'push' && 'production' || 'development' }}
    
    # Prevent concurrent runs on same ref
    concurrency:
      group: ${{ github.workflow }}-${{ github.ref }}
    
    steps:
    - name: Checkout
      uses: actions/checkout@v4
    
    - name: Setup Terraform
      uses: hashicorp/setup-terraform@v3
      with:
        terraform_version: 1.6.0
    
    - name: Configure AWS Credentials
      uses: aws-actions/configure-aws-credentials@v4
      with:
        role-to-assume: ${{ secrets.AWS_ROLE_ARN }}
        aws-region: us-east-1
        
    - name: Security Scan
      uses: aquasecurity/[email protected]
    
    - name: Terraform Init
      run: terraform init -upgrade=false
    
    - name: Terraform Plan
      id: plan
      if: github.event_name == 'pull_request'
      run: terraform plan -var-file=env.tfvars -no-color -out=tfplan
      continue-on-error: true
    
    - name: Update PR
      uses: actions/github-script@v7
      if: github.event_name == 'pull_request'
      with:
        github-token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
        script: |
          const output = `#### Terraform Plan 📖\`${{ steps.plan.outcome }}\`
          
          <details><summary>Show Plan</summary>
          
          \`\`\`terraform
          ${process.env.TERRAFORM_PLAN}
          \`\`\`
          
          </details>
          
          *Pushed by: @${{ github.actor }}, Action: \`${{ github.event_name }}\`*`;
          
          github.rest.issues.createComment({
            issue_number: context.issue.number,
            owner: context.repo.owner,
            repo: context.repo.repo,
            body: output
          })
    
    - name: Terraform Apply
      if: github.event_name == 'push'
      run: terraform apply -auto-approve -var-file=env.tfvars

Conclusion

The choice between Terraform Atlantis and GitHub Actions represents a tradeoff between specialization and integration. Atlantis delivers streamlined, purpose-built Terraform workflows with operational overhead, while GitHub Actions offers broader flexibility and integration at the cost of more configuration work.

In 2024-2025, trends favor hybrid approaches combining Atlantis workflow benefits with GitHub Actions execution capabilities. For teams starting with Terraform automation, GitHub Actions often provides easier entry with lower overhead. For teams with mature Terraform practices seeking standardized workflows, Atlantis offers compelling advantages. Increasingly, sophisticated organizations leverage both tools' strengths through complementary implementations.